News & Press

Paula's Press Column this week - Is deprivation in Dewsbury acceptable in the seventh richest country in the world?

Is deprivation in Dewsbury acceptable in the seventh richest country in the world?

Official figures revealed recently that some areas of Dewsbury featured in the top thousand most deprived areas in Britain. I would say this came as a shock to me, but sadly this is what many towns, particularly in northern England have come to accept as the norm.

Dewsbury has been left behind and neglected under this government, as have many northern towns. The Chancellor’s rhetoric of a ‘Northern Powerhouse’ has been one of the biggest cons of the Conservative’s general election manifesto.  The deprivation figures are hard evidence that all he is creating is a ‘Northern Poorhouse’.

I have had many constituents visit my office since being elected who are desperate. People with disabilities having all income cut off through not being able to get to assessments as far afield as Manchester. Families being forced to move out of their homes or face financial penalties because they have the audacity to have a spare bedroom. Not to mention the anticipation of the impending tax credit cuts to be inflicted next May, where many working families stand to lose thousands of pounds a year.

In July I voted against the government’s welfare bill and I welcome that the new Labour leadership has taken this stance and that we voted as a party to oppose the bill in September.

Some may simply say that getting people into work is the answer. Unfortunately our town is being starved of investment, with the government playing politics with devolution and decisions on transport infrastructure and as a result Dewsbury suffers and fails to grow and provide the jobs required. The figures are more concerning in other ways too. Many of those below the poverty line are actually in work, the governments so called ‘strivers’.  It is mainly those in work who will lose out financially with the impending tax credit cuts. The combination of these cuts and the Chancellor’s so called ‘living wage’ set to come into force in May, is doing no more than giving with one hand and taking away more with the other, leaving many more families struggling to pay their bills and provide a decent standard of living for their children.

But on top of jobs, wages and benefits the government fails to address the other huge contributor to deprivation - the lack of affordable housing. Private sector rents are spiralling out of control with rents on average £1000 more than in 2010. Despite this David Cameron plans to sell off more and more social housing stock at knock down prices. History shows that this is false economy, with former social housing falling into the hands of private landlords who are able to charge exorbitant rents and push up the housing benefits bill.

For many in Dewsbury, home ownership is an impossible dream. With average first time buyer deposits ranging between £16,000 & £20,000 based on research from Yorkshire Building Society. David Cameron announced at Conservative conference last week his new starter home plan, a scheme aimed at helping the younger generation get on the housing ladder as opposed to renting. However research from the housing charity Shelter suggests that in 98% of local authorities, those earning George Osborne’s so called ‘Living Wage’ would not be able to afford one of these starter homes. For many generations rip-off rent will continue.

In the seventh richest country in the world is it right that people in Dewsbury are suffering from deprivation and poverty? Of course it isn’t. The Government need to stop patronising us with terms such as ‘Northern Powerhouse’ and wake up to the harsh realities of severe deprivation in northern towns and cities caused as result of their policies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add your reaction Share

M&S refuse to climb down on hospital pricing policy

M_S.pngPaula Sherriff MP (Labour, Dewsbury & Mirfield) expressed disappointment today that Marks and Spencer had refused to follow the lead of WHSmith in reducing the price premium charged in hospital outlets.

 

The chain was under pressure from the MP, a former NHS worker who now sits on the House of Commons health select committee, following an investigation showing that they were charging significantly more in hospital outlets than in high street stores. There was widespread criticism that they were taking advantage of a vulnerable captive audience.

 

WHSmith agreed to a range of measures with Sherriff, including capping food prices in hospital shops and cheaper “get well soon” cards.

 

Marks and Spencer met the MP in Westminster today but claimed that they were legally unable to take any action on pricing in their hospital franchises, despite setting the wholesale prices. The retail giant denied they were “exploiting a captive market” or any “undue profiteering”, stating that the overall price uplift was a “single digit percentage” but admitted that it was significantly more for products such as flowers. They blamed higher prices on rents charged by NHS Trusts.

 

Despite criticism from unions and the Patients’ Association, the firm also denied that they had ever received any complaints from staff or unions on the subject.

 

Despite owning the depot, M&S hires staff through recruitment agency 24-7, with another company registered at the same address the legal employer. 75% of the staff are now treated as agency workers, using a loophole in employment law, despite effectively working exclusively for M&S. They receive significantly lower pay and only 7 hours of guaranteed work a week, with bosses able to turn them away when they arrive for shifts. The GMB trade union is pursuing a legal challenge.

 

It was revealed earlier in the year that M&S Chief Executive Marc Bolland received more than £2m in pay after bonuses, and the chain’s global revenue exceeds £10bn.

 

Paula Sherriff said:

 

“I'm deeply disappointed that Marks and Spencer hasn't followed the lead shown by WHSmith on hospital pricing. Patients feel like they’re getting their pockets picked to prop up the profits of one of Britain's biggest brands. The biggest premium is on flowers, and I think that’s just wrong – there will be people in desperate circumstances who want nothing more than to look after their loved ones and these shops are making a quick buck on the back of them.  

 

“No doubt M&S Chief Executive Marc Bolland could afford the extra on his two million pound pay package, but with this government’s tax credit cuts working people are struggling and the costs of looking after a seriously ill relative can make all the difference.”

 

“And just they're charging vulnerable customers more, they're paying vulnerable workers in their supply chain less. Put together, you have to question what’s happened to the values behind this brand.”

 

“I hope that we see some progress on conditions for their workers when we meet next. Their adverts say that there's only one store that does it like M&S, but apparently that’s not true for prices and it’s not true for payscales. Instead the most vulnerable customers and staff get charged more and paid less.”

 

The MP pledged to seek a Commons debate on the behaviour of Marks and Spencer if she wasn't satisfied with their response.

Add your reaction Share

Paula writes to Hospital Chief to reiterate opposition to blue badge parking charges

Paula today has written to Stephen Eames, Chief Exec of Mid Yorks Hospital Trust to reiterate her concerns regarding charging blue badge holders for parking at Mid Yorks Hospitals.

The letter follows a meeting with Mr Eames, last Friday where he agreed to send the decision back to the Trust Board. In the content she makes reference to her constituents who are being "tipped over the edge" by the changes and how some are paying over £100.00 / month on parking charges.

Paula commented: "I welcome that he has referred the decision back to the Trust Board. I will be there to make representations on behalf of my constituents who are suffering as a result of this decision."

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Paula's column this week - I am not afraid to speak out

There are many injustices in the world caused by vested interests, big business and government policy. Multi-national corporations such as Amazon, Starbucks, Google & Vodafone are getting away with paying minimal tax in this country whilst making huge profits.
 

 

This week the Labour Party have brought the issue of tax avoidance back on the agenda. I welcome the Shadow Chancellor’s announcement in his conference speech that the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn will claw back £25 billion in unpaid taxes from these huge corporations. It’s simply not right that whilst millions will be seeing cuts in their tax credits and cuts in their public services that these companies are let off the hook.

 

Of course taking on large corporations to claw back tax is only something a government can do only when in office. However the last few weeks have shown that through campaigning, we can make a difference and change the unethical behaviours of some large companies.

 

In August this year I publically spoke out against stores, including WH Smith, who were charging significantly more for products in hospitals. For example, it was reported that a bottle of water costing £1.00 at WH Smiths on the high street is marked at £1.79 at Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield. Following this there was widespread criticism that they were taking advantage of a vulnerable captive audience. 

 

The company claimed the higher costs were as a result of increased operational costs and complex delivery arrangements, but as I pointed out other chains who operate within hospital premises, such as Costa Coffee, charge the same for their products there as they do on the high street.

 

Following the revelations I requested a meeting with the CEO of WH Smith, Stephen Clarke, which was followed by an announcement that the store had agreed to drop prices for a range of goods in the chain's hospital stores, matching the deals available in high street stores for the first time. 

 

This is a welcome first step for NHS patients, visitors and staff, who were frankly being exploited to boost the bottom line of some of Britain's biggest businesses while the government looks the other way.  I will be meeting Marks and Spencers soon and I hope they will follow this lead. Whether it's higher prices in the shops or charging for car parks, those who use or work in our hospitals are paying an unfair price and it's time to change it.

 

Small achievements like this demonstrate how we can change things for the better through campaigning and not being afraid to speak out. 


 


 


 

Add your reaction Share

Paula calls on IDS to take action over appalling treatment of PIP claimants by ATOS

 

Paula calls on the Secretary of State for the Department of Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith to take action over appalling treatment of PIP claimants by ATOS

 

 

Dewsbury MP Paula Sherriff has written to the Secretary of State for the Department of Work and Pensions to demand action over the shocking treatment of Personal Independent Payment (PIP) claimants in the Kirklees area who, in some cases, are being forced to attend assessments as far afield as Manchester and Stockport.

 

The assessments for PIP, which will replace Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for people with lifelong disabilities, is being carried out by the contractor ATOS. The controversial American company had their contract terminated earlier this year for Employment Support Allowance (ESA) assessments due to poor performance.

 

The company have two assessment centres in Bradford, two in Wakefield and two in Leeds. But despite Kirklees being an authority of some 440,000 people, ATOS have refused to open an assessment centre in the area. A decision which is being challenged by Paula Sherriff and local patient champion Healthwatch Kirklees.

 

Paula said “I have had distressed constituents contact my office regarding this issue and I have heard of many other cases where people are unable to attend to their interviews due to the distances they are required to travel. In one recent case the claimant was given 3 hours’ notice that their appointment in Wakefield had been cancelled. They were then advised that they must attend an interview in Stockport.

 

“I have written to Secretary of State, Iain Duncan Smith, and ATOS regarding this despicable treatment of people with disabilities in my area and I am awaiting a response. This is not a one off incident and I urge anyone to come forward and let me know about their experiences so that we can tackle this issue together and ask for a fairer deal for Kirklees.”

 

 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Paula secures WH Smith climb down on hospital shop pricing

smithsjpg.jpgFollowing a meeting with Dewsbury and Mirfield MP Paula Sherriff, herself a former NHS worker, WHSmith CEO Stephen Clarke has agreed to drop prices for a range of goods in the chain's hospital stores, matching the deals available in high street stores for the first time. 

The chain came under pressure from the MP, who sits on the House of Commons select committee, following her revelation that stores including WHSmith were charging significantly more for products in hospitals. For example, it was reported that a bottle of water costing £1.00 at WH Smiths on the high street is marked at £1.79 at Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield. Following this there was widespread criticism that they were taking advantage of a vulnerable captive audience. 

The company claimed higher costs were as a result of increased operational costs, complex delivery arrangements and longer opening hours but Sherriff pointed out that other chains such as Costa Coffee which operate within hospital premises charge the same for their products as they do on the high street.

At the meeting with Sherriff, WH Smith agreed to match their standard prices for all stationery goods and will now stock a new range of 'value' greeting cards in their hospital outlets, with prices starting at 89p. Any High Street promotions will now be replicated in hospital outlets so that patients and visitors will not lose out. 

They also promised a monitoring system to ensure that food and drink prices do not exceed high street prices by more than a 1-2% margin of prices.

Other chains such as Marks and Spencer were also exposed for charging premium prices to hospital patients, visitors and staff, and Sherriff pledged to continue her campaign to secure a better deal. 

Paula Sherriff said:

 "This is a welcome first step for NHS patients, visitors and staff, who were frankly being exploited to boost the bottom line of some of Britain's biggest businesses while the government looks the other way. It's appalling that ministers have refused to act, but I will be meeting other retailers soon and I hope they will follow this lead. Whether it's higher prices in the shops or charging for car parks, those who use or work in our hospitals are the paying an unfair price and it's about time to change it." 

Add your reaction Share

The alarming costs of hospital agency staff - Yorkshire needs more nurses now!

Read my piece here on the alarming cost of hospital agency staff:

Read more
Add your reaction Share

PAULA QUIZZES HEALTH SECRETARY OVER MILLIONS SPENT BY MID YORKS TRUST ON MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS

Paula_Health_Select_Picture.pngDewsbury and Mirfield MP Paula Sherriff has expressed significant concern at the Mid Yorkshire Hospital Trust, which runs Dewsbury Hospital, spending in the region of £12 million since 2010 using management consultancy services.

 

Miss Sherriff has recently raised the issue within the House of Commons chamber and at the cross-party Health Select Committee. In July 2015 alone, the Trust paid out a huge £1.2 million to management consultants Ernst and Young. The Trust has controversially recently imposed parking charges on blue badge holders across its 3 hospital sites, hoping to recoup a total of £98,000.

 

Miss Sherriff recently raised this expenditure with Jeremy Hunt, Secretary of State for Health, questioning whether value for money was being provided to the tax payer. It is thought that Ernst and Young are currently providing cover for a number of managerial positions within the Trust. 

 

Mr Hunt agreed to look into the specific issue but did state that he broadly agreed with points made by Miss Sherriff regarding management consultants. He stated that caps had now been placed on management consultancy spend although this only related to new contracts and not existing arrangements.

 

Mr Hunt said 'Too often in the NHS there has been a reflex when a difficult decision has to be made, to hire someone from outside to come in and say what needs to be done, when actually the best people (to decide) are the people who work inside an organisation as they are the ones who have to implement it. I think we have been spending too much on management consultants.'

 

Miss Sherriff said “I am pleased that the Health Secretary agreed with me regarding the huge sums of money being spent locally using expensive management consultancies although I am disappointed that this expenditure has been going on for over 4 years. Surely this money could be better spent on patient care or the reduction of waiting lists.”

 

'The amount spent has been eye watering and I call on the Trust to review their policy. Whilst I acknowledge there are financial challenges the Trust has to meet, I fail to accept that this is the most cost effective value-for-money manner in which to do so. I will be raising this issue in a meeting the Chief Executive of the Trust in the near future.'

Add your reaction Share

Paula's Speech on the Detention of Refugee Woman

I recently spoke in a House of Commons debate regarding immigration detention. Having spoken with the charity 'Women for Refugee Women'  I have been particularly alarmed at the conditions in which many female asylum seekers are detained. Read my speech here:

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Paula's Speech on the Trade Union Bill - 14 September 15

TUBill.jpgIt has been a pleasure to listen to so many speeches today that show what trade unions really are. Not the ridiculous stereotype of trade union barons or militants but the millions of ordinary working people who elect their leaders and simply want a better, fairer, life at work.  

I must declare an interest in this debate. 

I am a proud trade union member. 

I was a shop steward. 

And yes, I have been on strike. 

And I was supported by my fellow trade unionists in all of those, and in getting to this place as well.  

And I'll tell you something, I'm proud of all those things.

I'm proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with fellow working people to get a better deal for people who slog their guts out just to get by and get on. 

I was proud to represent fellow members when they had a problem at work, making sure they knew their rights and got access to justice when they were wronged. And of course that meant standing up to unscrupulous bosses. But often it meant fewer days lost to sickness, happier staff and lower turnover, and productive negotiations when an issue came up. 

And yes, I was proud to stand on a picket line with REMPLOY workers shamefully abandoned by the last government and with low paid women workers fighting against downgrade. As a trade unionist, I knew it was a last resort, not one any of us wanted to take, but when all else fails, that's what is left. And without it, the bad bosses don’t want to negotiate in the first place. Quite simply, it allows working people to have some power over their lives.  

Throughout our history working people have had to fight for what we've got. Nothing has ever been gifted to us. 

Trade unionists fought for an end to child labour, an 8 hour day, paid annual leave, maternity and paternity pay, universal education, a minimum wage and yes, even the weekend. 

Key to that was an organised voice in politics. 

It is no secret that the affiliated trade unions support many of us on these benches, while those opposite rely on big businesses, corporations and wealthy individuals. 

And for decades there has been consensus that any changes to political funding rules should be done on a cross party basis. 

This Bill, like so many others, rips up the constitution for a naked political attack - an attack on the ability of trade unions and their members to have a say in politics, just at the time when it has never been more important that working people have a voice. 

At the moment hundreds of thousands of working people pay a few pence from their union subs to make their voices heard – paramedics or cleaners who don't have the luxury of a cosydinner with the chancellor; supermarket workers who won’t catch the Secretary of State on the veg aisle and teaching assistants who aren't likely to bump into the Prime Minister on the street. And indeed the last time someone did bump into the PM in West Yorkshire, it didn't end that well! 

Trade union members know if their unions are affiliated to Labour and we can opt out of making a contribution to the political fund. 

And every 10 years we are balloted as to whether they want a political fund at all. 

There is no real wrong that this Bill is trying to right. It is not about high principle, just low politics. 

Madam Deputy Speaker, I am not afraid to say that I am a working class woman when there are too few in this House. I spent my life before I came here working on the front line of our services,for the police supporting victims of crime and for our NHSsupporting all who needed care. When I walk round my constituency time and again people say that they want to see more people 'like them' in parliament. 

So I am not ashamed of trade unions’ political work – they are a part of our democracy, not a barrier to it. 

Working people in my constituency need a voice more than ever. This government would rather silence us than listen, but I for one will never stop standing up and speaking out for the people I represent, and it is in that spirit that I will oppose this Bill.

Add your reaction Share